The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) sentenced by the court below (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects the crime of this case, and that the defendant has no record of punishment exceeding the fine.

However, the crime of this case was committed by deceiving the victims by taking advantage of the personal trust relationship with the victim B, through lending and cash services in the victim's name, and by deceiving the victims to sell effective cultural merchandise coupons, and by deceiving them. In light of the method and contents of the crime of this case, it is not good to commit the crime in light of the method and contents of the crime of this case, damage to the victims including the victim B is not completely recovered, even though the defendant had been punished several times due to the fraudulent act using the Internet, and even if there were the records of punishment several times by the crime of this case, it does not seem to be unfair since the punishment imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Provided, That the burden of litigation costs shall be governed by the proviso of Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.