logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2014.06.25 2014고단513
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person engaged in bus driving vehicles B.

On March 16, 2014, at around 15:30, the Defendant was driving ahead of the three-lane of the bus bus terminal in Pyeongtaek-si, Pyeongtaek-si, Pyeongtaek-si, at a speed of 15km each hour from the National Bank to the two-lanes of the secondary line, at the speed of 15km each other.

Since the place has a crosswalk in the front section, there was a duty of care to reduce speed and safely drive the front section and the right and the right of the driver.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so, due to negligence in the course of his duties, brought the victim C (the age of 57) who walked along the crosswalk from the right side of the vehicle to the left side of the above vehicle, with the front door of the bus operation, and caused the death of the victim at the Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City D Hospital due to a scarcity damage.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. An accident scene photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a death certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Selection of alternative imprisonment without prison labor;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is that the Defendant, as a driver of an urban bus who is a means of public transportation, complies with the traffic signal of anyone, and even though he is responsible for operating a vehicle, there is a need to strictly punish the Defendant in light of the fact that the Defendant caused the serious result of the death of the victim by shocking the victim at the intersection in accordance with

However, the fact that the defendant recognized the facts charged in this case and reflects his mistake, that the driver's vehicle of the defendant is covered by a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance, that the victim's bereaved family members and the bereaved family members have agreed smoothly, traffic crime group, traffic accident group, general traffic accident group, type 2, basic area, and August.

arrow