logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.06.16 2017고단577
재물손괴등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 8, 2017, the Defendant damaged property: (a) around 03:40, the Defendant took a cab operating this 50 tax operated by the Victim B (50) in the river basin in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu; (b) was able to smoke while under the influence of alcohol in the direction of the school distance; (c) the Defendant: (d) took a cab to restrain the cab; and (d) took a cab to stop it; and (d) subsequently, the Defendant destroyed the 119,000 won of the cab’s repair cost by launching the cab from the si.

2. The Defendant assaulted the victim at the above date, time, and place of the assault on three occasions with the victim’s left side breamer by “the gum gum gum,” who expressed the victim’s desire to do so, on three occasions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. B written statements;

1. A voice recording CD;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigation report (to submit a written estimate for damage);

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Each of the crimes of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with regard to sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Provisional Payment Order is not less than the nature of the crime in light of the circumstances and contents thereof. The Defendant was punished by a fine on the grounds of the same or similar crimes as this case, and the Defendant committed each of the crimes of this case without being aware of the fact that he was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on the grounds of a suspended sentence of one year on the grounds of a suspended sentence of one year on the grounds of a suspended sentence of one year on the grounds of a suspended sentence of one year on the same or similar crimes in this case, on the other, the Defendant committed each of the crimes of this case without being aware of it. Meanwhile, the Defendant is deemed to have led to the crime of this case by contingency while drinking alcohol at the time.

arrow