A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. 공무집행방해 피고인은 2014. 4. 17. 21:00경 B 포터 화물차량을 운행하다가 창원시 마산회원구 C건물 앞 노상에 주차되어 있던 D 소유의 소나타 차량을 충격하고 도주하였다가, 같은 날 21:45경 신고를 받고 출동하였던 마산동부경찰서 E파출소 소속 경사 F 등에 의해 마산동부경찰서 교통조사계로 임의동행된 후 사건조사를 위해 대기하던 중, 같은 날 22:00경 교통조사계 사무실에서 인수인계를 하고 있던 경찰관들에게 계속해서 욕설을 하는 것을 보고 위 경사 F이 이를 제지한다는 이유로 경사 F에게 “이 씹할새끼야, 개새끼야, 오늘 나한테 한 번 죽어볼래, 모가지 따버릴까, 씹할놈, 이 좃같은 씹할새끼, 내가 누군지 아나”라고 욕설을 하면서 손으로 경사 F의 가슴을 2~3회 때리다가 멱살을 잡고 뒤로 2~3회 밀치는 등 폭행하여 경찰관의 범죄의 예방 및 수사에 관한 정당한 직무집행을 방해하였다.

2. The Defendant damaged public goods by taking advantage of the telephone apparatus installed above the 112, while arresting a flagrant offender for the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties within the transportation investigation office of the Mapo-dong Police Station, such as Paragraph 1, while arresting a flagrant offender at the transportation investigation room of the Mapo-dong Police Station, which was conducted an investigation within the 112 police box located in the Masan-si G Si, Changwon-si, the Defendant destroyed the telephone apparatus used by the public office by making it difficult for the security guard who was in the 112 police box to stop the telephone, and making it difficult for him to take the crypt by making it difficult for him to cut off the telephone.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of H’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense: Articles 136 (1) and 141 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution: