Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2019 Highest906] The Defendant had access to female students to raise living expenses, and had the professor of universities, etc. misrepresented them, and had the Defendant take money by fraud.
On September 6, 2017, the Defendant: (a) accessed the victim E (or, 20 years of age) who is a student of D University in the old world near C Bank Sam-dong Branch; and (b) asked the victim E (or the victim) who is a student of D University at D University at D University at “ how to go to D University, what is the major; and (c) made a false statement to the victim that “A is a professor of D University at D University, who is a professor of D University at D University at D, and would be urgent in exercising the D University at D. It is insufficient to pay money.” When lending money, the Defendant would end the exercise of the right to payment.
However, the defendant was not a professor of F University, and even if he borrowed money from the victim, he did not have any intention or ability to repay it.
As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 80,00 from the victim and acquired it, and acquired KRW 1,754,000 in total from 13 victims through 13 times until March 16, 2019, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table, and acquired KRW 1,754,00 from the victim.
[2019 Highest 1201] On July 29, 2018, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would transfer money to the account as soon as he/she arrives at the destination,” to the victim J (W, 21 years old), who was enrolled in the train in the direction of the Park Station from the Daegu subway Station 2, the Daegu subway Station 2, the subway Station from the Daegu subway Station 2, to the Daegu subway Station, and to the Plaintiff J (Y, 21 years old), who was enrolled in the train in the direction of the Park Station.”
However, in fact, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay the borrowed money from the victim, even though he borrowed money from the victim.
As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 80,00 from the victim and acquired it by fraud.
Summary of Evidence
[2019 Highest906]
1. The defendant;