(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.03.25 2014고단5638

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.03.25 2014고단5638

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around August 2013, the Defendant stated to the effect that, “A person who operates L households does interior works in Gangnam-gu, Seoul N, but the house owner does not pay the household price, now, he would pay the price later without making the last mold,” and that “A person who operates the house is liable for the household price,” was demanded from M to prepare and change a payment note to the effect that “A person who operates the house owner is liable for the household price.”

Therefore, the Defendant demanded the owner-owner to affix his seal on the letter of payment, but he was refused by theO, and the Defendant had expressed his intention to add “the letter of confirmation of the owner-owner” in the name of O P to the letter of payment.

1. On November 5, 2013, the Defendant forged a private document: (a) drafted a letter of payment to the effect that “the Defendant would pay to M by November 13, 2013 the household price of 18 million won,” without authority, for the purpose of exercising the name in the PC room in Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, for the purpose of uttering; and (b) written a letter of payment to the effect that “the Defendant would pay the household price of 18 million won to M: N: resident registration number Q and name P”; and (c) voluntarily signed P.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a letter of payment in the name of P, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

2. On November 5, 2013, the Defendant, at the office of “L household” operated by the “L household” operated by the Ma in the Young-si Suwon-si District (U.S.) around November 5, 2013, exercised the forged payment memorandum as if it were duly formed.

3. On November 5, 2013, the accused of fraud is performing human test work in Gangnam-gu Seoul N around the victim M around November 5, 2013;

B. A person has not yet received the price of a household from the owner of the house who has been responsible for the management of the office. Once the household has been supplied, it would pay without a mold as he has received the price of the household from the owner of the house;

In addition, the letter of payment by the owner of the house is responsible for the household price.

유사 판례

-서울서부지방법원 2018.05.25 2017가단25249

-부산지방법원동부지원 2016.07.19 2015가단23910

-대구지방법원포항지원 2017.09.08 2016가합429

-서울동부지방법원 2016.07.22 2015가단10814

-수원지방법원안양지원 2019.01.10 2017가단10785