The defendant shall be innocent.

At around 16:00 on September 19, 2016, the Defendant assaulted the victim D (at the age of 59) and the director's problems in the old world near Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul.

Judgment

The evidence, consistent with the facts charged, includes the statement of the victim D in this court and in the investigative agency; however, this court examines the following circumstances, i.e., ① the E claimed as the witness in this court that there was no fact that the victim appeared as a witness in this court and stated that there was no fact that the witness was present in this case; ② the victim was at one time the victim’s chin and two times the chest

stated, however, that the police and this court had a price at least once per chum, per chest;

It is not consistent, such as statements, ③ On the other hand, F, a witness at the scene, consistently states that there is no assault against a victim by the police and the defendant in this court; ④ According to the on-site CD in which the victim submitted as evidence to the prosecution at the latest, the defendant assaulted the victim at the point of time.

The voice of the victim, such as “the voice”, is the voice of the victim, but there is no sound or reaction to the surrounding people at the price of the chin or breast, and the F in the side of the victim not only is the arbitr who is arbitr.

(5) The victim was at the price of the bar and chest from the Defendant, such as “the victim”, and “the victim was at the price of the bar and breast.”

In light of the fact that there was no appeal for pain at the time, there was no photograph of the damaged father or no fact that the hospital received medical treatment, and the complaint was filed more than two months from the date of occurrence of the case, the statement of the victim, etc. alone is insufficient to recognize the facts charged of the case, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

In conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted pursuant to the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.