beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
"2018 Highest 2023"
1. On May 30, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 00:01 on May 30, 201, the Defendant: (b) boarded a business taxi operated by the victim D on the front road in Gwangju-si, Gwangju-si; and (c) caused the victim to operate the taxi to the front road of the G Hospital located in the Gyeonggi-si, Gwangju-si, 010 on the same day.
However, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the above fees even if he gets on the taxi of the victim.
As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, had the victim operate the taxi as above, and did not pay 23,400 won to the victim, thereby acquiring economic benefits equivalent to the same amount.
2. On July 29, 2018, the Defendant, around July 29, 2018, committed the crime, around 17:45, around July 29, 2018, at the “J” restaurant operated by the victim I in Gyeonggi-si, Gwangju-si, as if the victim I would normally pay the amount to the victim, the Defendant ordered 3 soldiers at the beginning, 1 contact-si, 3 soldiers.
However, in fact, the Defendant did not have sufficient cash or means of payment to pay the above food cost, so even if he received food from the victim, he did not have the intent or ability to pay the above food cost.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, was informed of the victim’s total amount of KRW 47,00 by deceiving the victim, and was provided with food equivalent to KRW 47,00.
Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.
3. On July 29, 2018, the Defendant, around July 19, 2018, ordered 1 knick and 1 knick-ju in the “MM” restaurant operated by the victim L in Gyeonggi-si, Gwangju-si, as if the Defendant would pay the victims normally.
However, in fact, the Defendant did not have sufficient cash or means of payment to pay the above food cost, so even if he received food from the victim, he did not have the intent or ability to pay the above food cost.
Nevertheless, it is not appropriate.