The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (six months of imprisonment and two years of suspended execution) on the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant led to the confession of and reflect against the crime of this case, there are circumstances that can be considered in the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, and that there is no substantial damage to the victim.

However, the crime of this case committed by the defendant, along with the punishment of the defendant, was committed by intrusion upon the victim's office by using hams and booms, and it is not good that the defendant interfered with incidental work by preventing the above hams and booms from spreading due to booms.

Defendant was unable to agree with the victim and was sentenced to a fine due to violence-related crimes.

In full view of such circumstances as the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the commission of the crime, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, as it is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.