logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2019.06.18 2019고단827
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 19, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 2.5 million by the Seoul Western District Court as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving). On February 19, 2013, the Seoul Western District Court was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year.

On February 19, 2019, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol of 0.108% in blood alcohol concentration at around 01:08, the Defendant driven a F Altima car at approximately approximately 200 meters from the vicinity of the Seoul Eunpyeong-gu Seoul History to the front of the E-cafeteria located in the same Gu D.

As a result, the Defendant, who violated the prohibition of drunk driving more than twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol again.

On September 19, 2011, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2.5 million by the Seoul Western District Court for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving). On February 19, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Seoul Western District Court. On February 19, 2013, the Seoul Western District Court was sentenced to one year for a violation of the Road Traffic Act. On February 19, 2019, the Defendant violated the prohibition of drunk driving on more than two occasions, such as regulating a vehicle under the influence of alcohol level of 0.108%.

On March 26, 2019, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol 0.057% of blood alcohol level on March 26, 2019, and the Defendant driven a JM6 car from the front side of H in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul to the first road of the same Gu from around 500 meters.

As a result, the Defendant, who violated the prohibition of drunk driving more than twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol again.

Summary of Evidence

"2019 Highest 827"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on traffic accident (1) (2) and report on the circumstantial statement of a drinking driver;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Criminal history records, reply reports (A), investigation reports (verification of the same type of force), and "2019 Highest 1364";

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the statement of the state of drinking drivers, and inquiry into the results of the control of drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Criminal history records (A) and the same kind of investigation reports;

arrow