logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2020.04.16 2018구단352
장해등급결정처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. In the occupational accident occurred on July 24, 2004, the Plaintiff received from the Defendant Corporation the approval of the name of the injury and disease, “the flag of the flag of the front flag of the front flag of the front flag of the front flag, the aggregate of the left-hand flag of the upper flag, the lower part of the left-hand flag of the upper-hand flag, the alteration of the left-hand flag of the upper-hand flag of the upper-hand flag, the alteration of the left-hand flag of the upper-hand flag of the upper-hand flag of the front flag of the front flag, the alteration of the upper-hand flag of the upper-

B. On May 15, 2017 after the above additional medical care, the Plaintiff claimed disability benefits to the Defendant Corporation.

C. On June 28, 2017, Defendant Corporation rendered a disposition of disability benefit site pay (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the grounds that the Plaintiff did not raise a disability grade compared to that before receiving additional medical care. D.

The Plaintiff filed a request for review with the Defendant Corporation as a procedure for the previous trial on the instant disposition, but was dismissed on September 21, 2017. Upon dismissal of a request for reexamination on December 14, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an appeal of this case on April 11, 2018.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 20 evidence, Eul evidence 1 and 4, the whole purport of the pleading

2. The plaintiff's assertion is that even after additional medical care, serious pains continue to exist, and it is possible to properly take the waters. Since there is an obstacle on the left-hand side, the left-hand side, and spine part, the entire disability grade should be increased, the plaintiff's disability grade still falls under class 8, the disposition of this case, which was made in the premise that the plaintiff's disability grade still falls under class 8

3. Attached statements to the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes;

4. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. (1) Medical opinion 1) Medical opinion opinion for the delayed disability of the doctor (fluorium 1, 2017) (No. 11, 2017) (No. 111) (No. 11), 20Do40Do30-20 left-hand side (7do 2.5do 5do 2, No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, No. 4 of the part part 1, No. 2, No. 5, No. 2, No. 3, No. 45588, Jun. 1, 201) (No. 11)

arrow