logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2014.05.16 2014노378
살인등
Text

Defendant

In addition, all appeals filed by the respondent for attachment order and the prosecutor are dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal and the person against whom the attachment order was requested (hereinafter referred to as the “defendants”) asserted that the lower court’s punishment (a period of 30 years of imprisonment and 20 years of location tracking device attachment) is too unreasonable, and the prosecutor asserts that the above punishment is too uneasible and unfair.

2. Determination

A. The crime of murder in part of the defendant's case committed a murder in this case, which is the most valuable value that cannot be altered, and the defendant committed a murder again within six months after the expiration of the period of parole due to the crime of murdering one's wife, and the defendant committed a murder in this case with a knife knife two parts of the victim's clothes for the purpose of murdering the victim. The crime of this case, which is highly likely to be subject to criticism in the motive and method of the crime. The victim's severe pain and fear appear to have been caused by the crime of this case. The victim's bereaved family members had no measures for recovery of damage. The defendant committed a murder in this case again after the expiration of the period of parole due to the crime of murdering his wife, which is the most valuable value that cannot be altered, and the defendant committed a murder in this case, which seems to have been harming the victim in the course of a dispute with the victim and the defendant, and there are no other factors that the defendant committed a serious personality and behavior or punishment of the defendant.

B. As long as the defendant and the prosecutor have filed an appeal against each prosecuted case, each appeal against an attachment order case shall be deemed to have been filed pursuant to Article 9(8) of the Act on the Probation and Electronic Monitoring, Etc. of Specific Criminal Offenders, however, the defendant, and the defendant.

arrow