Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a neighbor who works as a secondary manager B, and operates his business in the same kind as the victim C (V, 49 years old).
On June 8, 2013, at least 14:30 on June 14, 2013, the Defendant assaulted her chest on two occasions on the ground that it would interfere with the Defendant’s business due to construction while installing urban gas pipelines on the site of the relevant kindergarten in front of the above victim in Gwangju-gu, without the consent of the said victim.
2. We examine the judgment. The facts charged of this case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. Since the victim expressed his intention not to punish the defendant after the institution of the prosecution of this case, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.