beta
Text
The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The judgment of the first instance.
Reasons
1. Under the trade name of “D” (hereinafter “Defendant store”), the Defendant: (a) operated putets (for example, a game in which the number is indicated by launching a stable) in Namdong-gu, Incheon; (b) around March 8, 2019, the Plaintiff visited the Defendant store to put put put in six holess; and (c) during entering the game room, the Defendant was found to have suffered from the injury of “D”, i.e., the frame, closed, and closed down at the bottom of the base frame; or (d) the fact that the Plaintiff suffered from the injury of “D”, as the Plaintiff did not conflict between the parties, or in accordance with the overall purport of oral argument and oral argument as to Gap’s 1 through 4, 9 (including numbers and numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 4, and each film or video evidence.
2. Determination on the cause of the claim
A. The plaintiff's assertion is that the defendant should install safety facilities necessary to enable customers visiting the defendant's store to enjoy games safely, and take measures such as warning or notifying customers of the risk of suffering injuries in advance, etc., but did not give any notice to the plaintiff in advance, and there was no relevant safety facilities. Thus, the defendant has a duty to compensate for the amount of money claimed in the aggregate of medical expenses of 184,800 won and consolation money of 6 million won, as damages suffered by the plaintiff due to negligence in the construction, preservation and management of the stadium of the defendant store.
B. The reasoning for this part of the judgment is as stated in the second five or ten parts of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this part of the judgment is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.