logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 영월지원 2015.09.22 2015고단323
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around July 15, 2015, the Defendant driven BM520 automobiles while under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.264% in the section of about 5km from the parking lot in the Jin Chang-gun of Gangseo-gun to the 4044-ro of the same Gyeongwon-gun in the Jin Chang-gun of Gangseo-gu to the 5km-gun, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury caused by Dangerous Driving) is a person engaged in driving a passenger vehicle.

The Defendant operated a car as stated in the above paragraph (1) on the road of the 1-lane Dok-do Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, which is located in the Jin Chang-gun Special Metropolitan City, which is located in 4044, in the Jin Chang-gun Special Metropolitan City. The Defendant proceeded at the speed of the non-speed by driving the car from the Dok-do Special Metropolitan City, which is located in

Since there is a center line of yellow solid lines at the time, a person engaged in the driving of a motor vehicle shall observe the vehicle line, properly see the front and rear left, accurately operate the steering wheel and brake system, and shall not drive the motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol while it is difficult to drive the motor vehicle normally.

Nevertheless, as described in paragraph (1) above, the Defendant was driven in the opposite direction due to the negligence of the injured party C (Nam, 72 years old) who was driving while driving under the influence of alcohol while it was difficult to drive under the influence of normal operation, and was driven in the opposite direction due to the negligence of the central line. The Defendant was driven in the front of the car as specified in paragraph (1) above.

As a result, the Defendant suffered, by such occupational negligence, the injury to the victim E (the 63 years of age), such as a frying of a crym crym fry fry, etc., where the treatment period cannot be known to the victim C, and the victim E (the 63 years of age) who was on the fry fym fry,

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. The fact-finding survey report, the report on detection of a host driver, the report on the request for appraisal, and whether the driver is in danger;

arrow