All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The lower court’s sentencing is too inappropriate.

B. The lower court’s sentencing is too uncomfortable.

2. The instant crime requires strict punishment against the Defendant, in light of the following: (a) the Defendant rapes the victim who was accused of the crime of rape, etc., and the victim’s sexual intercourse with the victim who was accused of the crime of rape, etc., by transmitting a M message as if the victim’s husband was informed of the victim’s sexual intercourse, threatening the victim, etc.; and (b) such crime is not good.

However, when considering the conditions of sentencing as stated in the argument of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the court below is judged appropriate, and it is not unfair because it is too heavy or unfeasible. Thus, the above argument by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit.

3. In conclusion, since the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition (Provided, That the "Article 283 of the Criminal Act" of the 4th page 12 of the judgment below is obvious that it is a clerical error in the "Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act", and thus, it is correct under Article 25(1) of the Regulations on Criminal Procedure.