logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.08.30 2017고단1809
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 25, 2017, at around 02:00, the Defendant: (a) stated that the Damar Cargo in front of the instant B building operated by the victim C passes in front of the Defendant’s person; (b) stated, “I am back, I am son, but I am son, I am son, I am son, and I am at the top of the instant cargo vehicle owned by the victim.”

Accordingly, the defendant was cut to be the victim's possession, and one was damaged to repair cost of KRW 100,000.

2. 공무집행 방해 피고인은 2017. 3. 25. 02:00 경 위와 같은 장소에서 위와 같은 재물 손괴행위로 112 신고를 받고 현장 출동한 경기 광명 경찰서 D 지구대 소속 경찰관 E에게 “ 딱 보니 나이도 어린 놈이 적당히 해 라, 경찰 아” 라며 비아냥거리면서 위와 같은 재물 손괴행위에 대해 발뺌을 하던 중 위 C이 파손된 썬 바이 져 조각을 찾아 피고인에게 제시하자 위 경찰관 E에게 “ 개새끼야, 증거 찾아오니깐 좋냐

"...................... assaulted tobacco smoke once on the face of the police officer E...

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by the police officer E on the duty to maintain public order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of field vehicles photographs and statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), the choice of fines (the confession and rebuttal of the defendant, the point of agreement with the victim of the crime of destroying property, the first offender who has no record of committing an offense, and the extent of obstructing the performance of official duties is minor);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow