The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence sentenced by the first instance court (one year of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) is too unreasonable.

2. There is no change in circumstances that may be considered in sentencing after the judgment of the first instance court, and considering the various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of the instant case, the Defendant’s primary deliberation sentence is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.

However, under Article 25 (1) of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure, ex officio, the meaning of the column for the application of the law in the judgment of the first instance among the judgments

1. The point of sale of game products that did not receive the grade of "B" as to criminal facts and the selection of punishment: Article 44(1)2, Article 32(1)1, and Article 21(1) of the former Game Industry Promotion Act (amended by Act No. 14424, Dec. 30, 2016; hereinafter the same shall apply) (amended by Act No. 14424), Article 44(1)2, Article 32(1)2, Article 32(1)1, and Article 32(1) of the former Game Industry Promotion Act (amended by Act No. 14424, Dec. 30, 201); aiding and abetting the provision of game products that did not receive a grade: the change to imprisonment shall be corrected.