Defendant

In addition, all appeals filed by the respondent for the attachment order are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence (a life imprisonment, etc.) imposed by the lower court by the Defendant and the person who requested the attachment order to be issued by the Defendant and the person who requested the attachment order to be issued is too unreasonable.

B. The defendant and the person who requested the attachment order B1) and the person who requested the attachment order (hereinafter only referred to as the "defendant") did not directly price the victim due to the loss, etc., and the defendant A did not give a steel bars, and there is no fact that the defendant A told "I soon complete and complete the attachment order."

Nevertheless, the court below found Defendant B guilty on the grounds that Defendant A’s statement without credibility or Defendant B’s false confessions through conference or intimidation by investigation agencies. The court below erred in the misapprehension of facts, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2) The punishment sentenced by the lower court (one hundred years of imprisonment, etc.) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination on the part of the case of the defendant

A. Defendant B’s assertion of mistake as to Defendant B’s facts

In light of the following circumstances, the lower court rejected the aforementioned assertion in determining that Defendant B was aware of the victim’s head on two occasions and gave the Defendant A a steel, and that “I am late and complete as soon as possible.”

가) 피고인 B이 망치로 피해자의 머리를 가격하였는지 여부에 관한 판단 ⑴ 피고인 A의 진술의 신빙성 검토 ㈎ 피고인 B의 첫 번째 망치가격에 관한 진술의 신빙성 검토 ① 피고인 A은 경찰 2회 피의자조사부터 원심 법정에 이르기까지, ‘ 피해자를 구타하다가 피고인 B이 갑자기 망치로 피해자의 머리를 3회 내리쳤고, 자신도 피고인 B으로부터 망치를 넘겨받아 피해자의 머리를 수회 내리쳤다 ’라고 일관되게 진술하고 있고, 그 진술 번복 경위에 대하여도...