Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,00, and by a fine of KRW 1,500,000, respectively.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A access to the Internet gambling site from January 6, 2013 to January 25, 2013, Defendant A stated the total sum of KRW 3,800,000 in the indictment amounting to KRW 3,80,000, in the indictment amounting to 11 times via D’s account in the name of Defendant C (E) in the National Bank account (C) in the name of Defendant C, as shown in the slip of crime, but it is apparent that it is a clerical error of KRW 3,800,00 in the indictment amounting to 3,80,000, since it is apparent that it is a clerical error of KRW 3,800,000.

In order to deposit the money of his Do, money in a foreign professional axis game, domestic or overseas deaf-gu game, etc., and to receive 1.5 times the amount of money to be distributed to winners, it was carried out gambling in the form of a sports soil where the acquisition and loss of property is disputed.

2. From November 15, 2012 to February 1, 2013, Defendant B visited the Internet gambling site with the Defendant’s French ID and deposited KRW 1,344,963 in the name of the Defendant with D’s new bank account (F) in the name of the Defendant, as shown in the attached list of crimes, and carried out a gambling in the form of a sports territory, in which the Defendant B received money from the overseas professional axis games, domestic and overseas games, etc. and received money from the winners in the event of the winning.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. An inquiry sheet and specification of transactions requested;

1. Application of specified financial transaction information and copies thereof to statutes;

1. The Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: The main sentence of Article 246 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the former Criminal Act (Amended by Act No. 12575, May 14, 2014)

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The sum total of the instant gambling crimes for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the period of gambling and the Defendants’ criminal records did not have been punished for the same kind of crime; but the Defendant A is a number of other crimes.