1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine of 700,000 won;

2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, fifty thousand won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is both C and C, and D are their children.

E is the wife of C(F) and G, H, and I are all the husband of E's friendship, while J is the husband of E's friendship.

C and Defendant A, together with C’s large leakage, L, small leakage, M, smallest form of body, etc., arrived at the funeral hall of the deceased F (C) No. 201 on October 7, 2012, around 12:40, Kimhae-si N, Kim Jong-si.

However, C did not directly contact E, who was sentenced to death on June 10, 190 a day before the death of F, and decided to “pathn” without any awareness about funeral procedures, etc., and the funeral home No. 201, and reported that E, who was a pro-friendly scar of E, was living in the country where he was living in the country where he was living in the country where he was living in the country where he was living in the country where he was living in the country where he was living in the country where he was living in the country. Then, I would be able to consider “I who is living in the country, and how you are related to the deceased.”

At this time, E entered into an empty space, and “E” came to take a bath, such as “Iphere frith of this arb,” and “Iphere arb,” and came to go to the entrance corridor 201 at the funeral hall, so it would be confirmed that C and Defendant A were permanently staying in a dispute with one another, and C and C were going to move to a small amount of Ma or Ma and to the entrance corridor 201 at the funeral hall.

At around 12:50 on October 7, 2012, the Defendant confirmed that, at the entrance corridor No. 201 at the above O funeral hall No. 201 on October 7, 2012, the Defendant occupied the victim E (n, 72 years of age) who was moving to M, and caused E to wear the head debt. On the same day, at around 12:54 on the same day, the Defendant continued to put E head debt, and at the entrance of the above funeral hall No. 201 as a matter of permanent stay and funeral procedures against E, while the Defendant had any dispute against E, he was able to take a bath, such as “Cakia,” etc., against the Defendant.