logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 특허법원 2018.08.31 2018허1912
등록무효(상)
Text

1. The decision made by the Intellectual Property Tribunal on January 17, 2018 by the Intellectual Property Tribunal on the case shall be revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff’s original registered trademark of this case was registered by Escom Ltd. (hereinafter “Escom”) upon filing an application for trademark registration. On June 1, 2017, the trademark transfer registration was completed on the ground of transfer to the Plaintiff.

The filing date of the instant registered trademark (A2 and 3) 1/registration date/registration number: The filing date of the instant registered trademark (A2 and 3) / the registration date/registration number: May 15, 2013/ 15/51, 2017 (No. 125370/ May 24, 2017) old sex: 3) designated goods of category 9: Maws, Mawsp, computers, computer monitors, computer monitors, computer monitors, computer discs, disks, computer discs, disc kickbs, computer kibs, computer kids, display disks, electronic disc, portable electronic disc, street disc, street recording machine, street recording apparatus, sound recording apparatus, sound recording apparatus, sound recording apparatus, sound recording apparatus (excluding motion pictures), portable data storage/pporter functions.

B. The pre-use trademarks of the former pre-use trademarks 1 and 2 and the pre-use trademarks 3 are keyboards, Maices, Nowon-gu Schooling, Nowon-gu Schooling, Nowon-gu Schooling, Nowon-gu Officeing, CPU clocks, Hphones, HCs, and wheels, etc.

C. 1) On June 29, 2017, the Defendant: (a) against the Plaintiff, the right holder of the instant registered trademark, the Intellectual Property Tribunal; and (b) against the Plaintiff, the instant registered trademark constitutes Article 7(1)9 of the former Trademark Act (wholly amended by Act No. 1403, Feb. 29, 2016; hereinafter “former Trademark Act”) on the same or similar basis as pre-use trademarks and their marks and products recognized remarkably by consumers as indicating another person’s goods.

In addition, the registered trademark of this case is identical or similar to the pre-use trademarks, which are recognized as indicating the goods of a specific person in the Republic of Korea, and their marks and designated goods.

arrow