logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.06.12 2017나73930
물품대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

In a case where A enters into a double contract with another company that is not B, or is entrusted with logistics agency, or where a person operates logistics, and where A requests the delivery of goods different from the actual sales quantity, A shall be presumed as follows:

Standard on 30 days for storage expenses for door-to-door delivery volume per month: 0-1,000 2,000 30,000 above 2,000 30,000 30,0000 30,001-3,0000 2,0000 2,0000 27,500 27,500 27,000 above Dong 3,000-10,000 2,000-10,000 2,000-10,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 dong 25,000 dong 25,000 dong 25,000 dong 2,000 or more, and 2,000 5,0050 east of goods storage management * the basic goods storage charges and eMP's basic goods storage management * the basic goods storage charges * the basic goods sales management *.

B. The Plaintiff performed the instant contract on behalf of the Defendant for storage and transportation under the instant contract by July 2016, and thereafter, the Defendant did not entrust the Plaintiff with the instant contract from August 2016 to the end of the contract ( July 21, 2017).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-1-4, Eul evidence 1-1-4, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Judgment on the plaintiff's claim

A. According to the written estimate of this case relating to the Plaintiff’s claim 1 business expenses, the Defendant shall be liable to the Plaintiff even if there is no monthly shipment amount.

arrow