logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.06.08 2017고단110
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a B knife vehicle.

On December 15, 2016, when the Defendant did not buy a mandatory insurance policy at around 19:05, the Defendant driven the said van, and driven the two-lanes of the three-lanes in front of the Djunju-gu Heung-gu Interropo-si, Cheongju-si, with the speed of 30km from the long distance to the long distance of the lappian dental death.

At the time, the vehicle is at night and at a place where there are many vehicles leaving, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving the vehicle, such as making it possible for the driver of the vehicle to live well on the right and the right and the right, and securing a safe distance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and led the Defendant to drive a vehicle in an excessively close vicinity to the front section of the passenger vehicle of the victim E (Woo, 29 years old) who was driving in the front section of the Defendant’s knife vehicle, followed the part of the driver’s knife vehicle of the victim E (Woo, 29 years old) in the front section of the said knife vehicle, and caused the said knife vehicle to receive the rear part of the hST5 vehicle of the victim G (Woo) who stopped in the front section of the front section in the front section.

Ultimately, the Defendant by occupational negligence inflicted injury on the victim E, such as salt, tensions, etc., in which approximately two weeks of treatment is required for SM5 passengers, and 1,547,418 won for repair, respectively, to the victim I (the victim 62 years of age) who is a string for SM5 passengers, and the victim I (the victim 1,547 years of age) who is the 62 years of age), and escaped without taking measures such as providing relief to the victim by immediately stopping the mM5 car.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. The actual survey report, on-site photographs, and vehicle photographs (B);

1. Inquiry into each mandatory insurance;

1. Each investigation report (verification of video data from damaged vehicles) and each of them;

arrow