The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

가. 사실오인 이 사건 공소사실 중 현주건조물방화미수의 점에 관하여, 피고인은 담배를 피우던 중 깜박 잠이 들어 실수로 불을 낸 것이지 방화의 고의를 가지고 이 부분 공소사실 기재와 같이 불을 지르지 않았다.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the Defendant did not have the intention to inflict an injury at the time.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court (two years of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court regarding the assertion of mistake of facts, the Defendant thought that she would kill himself/herself, as stated in the facts charged in the instant case, and caused a fire by putting him/her out to the public notice room where he/she had resided in the same public notice room, with the intention of fire prevention, and with the intention of fire prevention attached to the same fire, and by removing the Defendant’s window where the victim G residing in the same public notice room had been postponed at the time, he/she removed the Defendant’s window where the victim G resided in the same public notice room at the same time, and with the intent of injury to the victim, caused the injury by putting the victim’s left head on one time

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of mistake is without merit.

① 피고인은 자신의 방에서 불이 난 경위에 관하여 경찰조사를 받으면서 ‘담배를 피우던 중 깜박 잠이 들어 실수로 불을 냈다.’라는 취지로 진술하다가, 검찰조사를 받을 때에는 ‘누군가 자신을 죽이려 한다고 생각하여 라이터를 이용해서 고의로 이불에 불을 붙였다.’라며 이 사건 현주건조물방화미수 범행을 자백하는 취지로 진술을 번복한 이래 원심까지 그러한 태도를 유지하였으나, 이 법원에 이르러서는 다시 경찰진술과 같은 주장을 하고 있다.

However, the act of the defendant prior to the crime of attempted fire-prevention of the present building of this case as follows, and the defendant.