Defendant

The appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment and one year and eight months) of the original judgment is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances are as follows: (a) the Defendant’s mistake in depth and reflects his or her mistake; (b) actively cooperate in the investigation; and (c) the most likely support the de facto marriage wife and child, who is a disabled person.

However, crimes related to narcotics, etc., such as this case, should be eradicated because they are highly likely to cause serious harm to their families and society as well as the parties. Accordingly, there is a need to strictly punish the defendant. The defendant has the record of being punished several times, and the defendant did not know himself during the period of repeated crime for the same kind of crime and led to the crime of this case. The scope of the recommended sentence for the crime of this case according to the sentencing guidelines established by the Sentencing Committee established by the Supreme Court is from 1 to 5 years. From 1 year, crimes of this case: 3 types, such as drug crime group, medication, simple possession, etc. (b) and 1 year: Determination of the recommended area; 1 year to 3 years; 1 year to 3 years; 2 years to 1 year to 5 years; 3 years to 1 year to 5 years; 3 years to 1 year to 5 years; 3 years to 8 years to 5 years to 8 years to 5 years to 8; 2 years to 1 year to 7.

3. The Defendant’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, on the grounds that there are no grounds for appeal.