logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.01.23 2018나312594
소유권말소등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff and B’s “J” management process 1) On May 2, 1985, the Plaintiff completed the registration of transfer of ownership on the grounds of sale with respect to the land of 1,517 square meters per 1,517 square meters per Dong-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, and on March 30, 1985, the land listed in attached Table No. 2 (hereinafter “I land”).

(2) Around 200, the Plaintiff newly constructed a 1,517 square meters of land before D, as well as a building related to the life of the deceased, in addition to the front angle or the mountain door, within the temple of a bond, and started to operate a personal inspection of the name of "J" with his/her father, B, and other family members.

3) On November 2, 2010, the Plaintiff: (a) on November 2, 2010, the size of 1,517 square meters prior to D, is 735 square meters prior to D (hereinafter “D land”).

) The land listed in [Attachment List No. 1] and the land listed in [Attachment List No. 1 (the land category at the time was “former,” but hereinafter referred to as “G land, regardless of whether before

(4) Around 2010, JA’s required bonds located on G land were kept intact and were newly built after having removed JA’s legal watch and mountain sense. On April 22, 2011, B completed the registration of preservation of ownership as to the general wood structure structure and the general wood structure and the 10.32 square meters per 10.32 square meters per 10.32 square meters per 10.32 square meters per 10 square meter per 10.32 square meter per 10 square meter per 10 square meter (hereinafter “the instant temple building”).

B. The Plaintiff and B, as seen above, become aware of the Defendant (legal title: L) who was working as the chief knowledge of the “K company” in the process of operating the J company, and subsequently exchanged the Defendant with the Defendant, such as having the Defendant hold a legal meeting at his/her J company and recommending the Defendant to join the J company. (2) On June 21, 2012, upon the Plaintiff’s request from the Plaintiff that the Defendant would wish to register the J company with the F Religious Organizations, the instant temple owned by the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff will be donated free of charge to the “J company”.

arrow