1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant C, Defendant D, Defendant E, Defendant F, Defendant G, and Defendant H are jointly and severally networked with Nonparty I and J.

A. Comprehensively taking account of the purport of the arguments stated in Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including each number), the bankruptcy trustee of the above L. 2 shall not be deemed to have established a false list on the net K, I, J, and Eul, who was an management of M. 2, and shall not be audited, and the Defendants, I, and J, who were the heir of the network K, and I, filed a lawsuit claiming damages against the plaintiff (hereinafter "related case"). The Seoul Central District Court Decision 2005Ga5739, Jan. 11, 207, the court of first instance affirmed the part concerning the above claim against the plaintiff 200 million won to the bankruptcy trustee of the above L. 1, 207, and the appellate court ordered the plaintiff 200 million won to be paid within the limit of 30 billion won, and the remaining part of the judgment against the plaintiff 200 million won to be paid within the limit of 130 billion won, and the court of appeal shall be dismissed within the limit of 20393 billion won, respectively.