Defendants shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A: (a) on July 11, 2016, at the main point of “E” located in “E” located in “E” located in “Seoul High Sea-gu, Jin-si; (b) on the ground that the victim F, while drinking the victims and alcohol, said Defendant: (c) had several people in the vicinity of the victims, such as G, the victim’s seat; (d) G, the owner of the said main shop; and (e) the owner of the name in distress; and (e) on the ground that the victim F, while drinking the victims and alcohol, was said to have been said to have been said to have been said to have been said victims.

The victim I, who is the first executive of the victim F, expressed his or her desire to do so, such as "Hano and the same year I," and whether the victim I, who is the first executive of the victim F, would have expressed his or her desire to do so.

In doing so, the victim I expressed his desire to the victim I, such as “I am, I, I am, I am, I. I.

Accordingly, the Defendant insultd the victims each by openly.

2. As described in paragraph (1) above, Defendant B expressed the victim I, as described in paragraph (1), with the victim I, who described in the above paragraph (1) at the time, at the time, and at the place of the foregoing paragraph (1), expressed his desire to “I, as described in paragraph (1), for the reason that the victim F was unbrupted by the victim F, who was a member of the Defendant’s act, and was expressed to the victim I, such as G, the owner of the above main shop, H, and the victim’s name in the vicinity of the victims, and expressed that “I, as described in paragraph (1), I will not want to “I, I, I, I,” “I, I,” and that I, “I, I, at the entrance of the main shop, I will not want to take the victim to “I, I, and I, who will do so.”

Accordingly, the Defendant insultd the victims each by openly.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of the witness F, I, J, K, and H (the Defendants’ act, content of damage, the fear and response of victims, and the situation before and after the commission of the crime are consistent and concrete.

The contents of statements are inconsistent with other evidence.

On the other hand, the statements of the victims do not seem to be false, and are made in this court.