A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

On February 23, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties in the Daegu District Court, and on September 21, 2012, on September 21, 2012, the Defendant completed the execution of the sentence.

[2013 Height575]

1. At around 01:30 on October 9, 2013, the Defendant injured the victim’s victim E (nive, 30 years of age), who is an employee of the main store in the Daju-dong-dong-dong-dong-si, Chungcheongnam-do, on the ground that he was aware of the mind, and caused the victim’s injury to the victim by taking away from plastic material located on his her table, toward the face of the victim, suitable for the baby’s face.

2. On October 9, 2013, the Defendant: (a) informed on the front side of the instant Dju, the case as indicated in the foregoing paragraph (1), G of the F District of the Ansan Police Station, and the situation where the slopeH was called out after having been reported on October 9, 2013; (b) informed the victim E of the defect in order to accompany the victim E to the earth; and (c) took a bath to the said police officer, i.e., “if the inside was erroneous, e.g., f., e., e., g., e., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g.,

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the control of crimes.

[2013 Highest 592] On October 16, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 16:20, at the top of the J cafeteria located in Ansan-si I, the Defendant was at the above J cafeteria operated by the Victim K (Inn, 55 years of age); (b) the door door is closed; and (c) the victim, while making telephone conversations with the victim for drinking during the period of drinking, had the victim “hing the telephone if he would be the same,” thereby causing the Defendant “hing the telephone.” As such, the Defendant destroyed the Defendant’s door and concrete ice, which is a dangerous thing in the place, and caused damage to the Defendant’s entrance door repair cost at KRW 350,000, the glass door repair cost of the entrance owned by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

[2013 Height575]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E, G, and H;

1. Each investigation report (as to photographs, related diagnostic documents of victim E), respectively (as to photographs);

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. K. H.