All appeals by the prosecutor and the defendant are dismissed.

1. The prosecutor and the defendant asserts that the sentencing of the court below (six months of imprisonment) is too minor or unreasonable.

2. The fact that the defendant has the same and similar type of judgment, the fact that the defendant who is adult has caused the instant case to satisfy the sexual awareness of the victimized juvenile, and the fact that the defendant intimidations the injured juvenile to spread photographs by demanding more severe points of view: Provided, That the court below's sentencing is appropriate in full view of the fact that the defendant's parents have been agreed with the victim at the time of the trial, and other circumstances such as the defendant's occupation, age, character and conduct, family environment, etc.

3. In conclusion, since the prosecutor's and the defendant's arguments are without merit, all appeals by the prosecutor and the defendant are dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition

(In the judgment of the court of first instance, the third party’s “election” portion in the judgment of the court of first instance is apparent to be a clerical error, and thus deleted.