(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.12.26 2018고합310

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.12.26 2018고합310

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

The seized divers (No. 4) and one finger (No. 5) shall be confiscated, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

To the extent that the facts charged do not disadvantage the defendant's exercise of his/her right to defense, some correction or correction was made according to facts obtained through the examination of evidence.

[criminal history] On October 23, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes in the Seoul Western District Court, and on March 23, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes in the Seoul Western District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on April 4, 2018.

[2] On September 25, 2018, at around 22:58, the Defendant was in front of the D office operated by the victim C at the time of opening the entrance, removed the entrance security system with a security card held by the Defendant, and intruded into the said system, removed 7 hivers from the main body of the computer to divers, removed 7 hives in total at the market price of 1.4 million won, and then removed 7 hives.

The CCTV 31 500,000 won, from the key to the E-Poter vehicle, was carried with the said vehicle in an amount of KRW 6,00,00,000, and the said vehicle was loaded with the goods owned by the said vehicle, and used the said vehicle, thereby thefting the property equivalent to KRW 7,90,000,00, in total, from the victims, until October 18, 2018, from the time to time, the said vehicle was habitually stolen property of KRW 9,851,00,00, in total, four times, such as the statement in the list of crimes.

As a result, the Defendant was sentenced twice or more due to the habitually theft crime, and habitually stolen the property within three years after the execution of the sentence is completed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1.Each police with respect to F and G.

참조조문

-특정범죄 가중처벌 등에 관한 법률

유사 판례

-울산지방법원 2017.02.03 2016고합436

-제주지방법원 2017.11.09 2017고합76

-서울서부지방법원 2017.08.10 2017고단1576

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.06.14 2017고단850

-서울동부지방법원 2018.05.17 2018고합49