1. The plaintiff

A. As to Defendant A’s KRW 87,977,632 and KRW 37,653,262 among them:

B. Defendant B, Defendant H, and Defendant I.

1. Since there is no dispute between the parties to the judgment of the cause of the claim and the facts stated in the changed cause of the claim do not exist between the parties, or it can be acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of the whole entries and arguments of Gap 1 through Gap 4, the plaintiff's assertion against the defendants of Japan is

2. According to the overall purport of the statements and arguments of the Defendants C, D, E, F, and G alleged that they renounced inheritance to the network J, the above Defendants asserted that they renounced inheritance, and thus, according to the whole purport of the statements and arguments of the Plaintiff C, D, E, F, and G, Defendant E filed an application for renunciation of inheritance with the Jeonju District Court 2006Ra-Ma493 on August 3, 2006 and accepted it on August 11, 2006, and the judgment was rendered on August 22, 2006 by Defendant C, D, F, and G filed an application for renunciation of inheritance with the Jeonju District Court 2006Ra531 on August 30, 2006, the above Defendants’ assertion that they did not inherit the obligations of the deceased J has merit.

3. The plaintiff's respective claims against the defendant A, the defendant B, the defendant H, and the defendant I are justified, and each claims against the remaining defendants are dismissed as they are groundless.