Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On March 28, 2020, from around 06:05 to around 06:32, the Defendant: (a) at the “C” entertainment station operated by the victim’s name in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, for the reason that he was unable to receive the service, and the cost was excessive; (b) the Defendant confirmed CCTV; and (c) entered the 202 heading room located by other customers; and (d) the said entertainment station employees, and (e) carried off the said entertainment station employees, and (e) the Defendant called “D, which is a governance, must be opened, .... to be opened until once every end,” and (e) the Defendant threatened the police officers belonging to the Gangnam Police Station of the Seoul Gangnam Police Station, Seoul, which was called upon 112, with the notification, with no requirement to resolve the situation at present. The police officers need not be called up.
I ambling of light water.
Whether or not they are within the territory of Korea.
“The noise,” etc. interfered with the victim’s entertainment shop business by force between approximately 30 minutes of disturbance, thereby obstructing the victim’s entertainment shop business.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Each legal statement of witness D and E (the defendant and his defense counsel has no record of interfering with his/her duties and is not so;
Even if a request for the verification of the details of the paid entertainment expenses is made, and the crime of this case is caused to the crime of this case, and the illegality is excluded because it is not contrary to the social norms, but the above witness's testimony is not accepted in light of the relevant witness's testimony) of the law.
1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;
1. The punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into consideration the following facts: (a) there is no previous conviction for the same kind of reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act; (b) the fact that entertainment expenses were paid in two middle; (c) the crime of this case was committed while the person committed the crime; and (d) the fact that the person committed noise, etc., and against the noise, etc., the punishment shall be determined as per the order: