Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a holder of BKaman car and CKaman car.

No person shall operate any motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance.

1. On May 27, 2015, the Defendant operated the said vehicle that was not covered by mandatory insurance on eight occasions, from the time on November 9 of the same year, from the time on which the Defendant operated a BKan-ray car at a large-scale village located in the pushed tight at the south of the south of the populated at the time of smuggling, as shown in Annex 1 of the List of Crimes No. 1.

2. On February 1, 2016, the Defendant: (a) from that time, operated a car for car with Kanun which is not covered by mandatory insurance in the Do-Eup Do-Eup west-gu, Hayang-gu, Hayang-si, Hayang-si, Hayang-do, at around 09:35.

9. By August 1, 200, the foregoing vehicle was operated not by mandatory insurance over eight occasions, such as the part of the annexed crime list 2.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Inquiries into respective non-insurance operations vehicles;

1. Inquiry into each obligatory insurance contract;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each original register of motor vehicle registration;

1. Relevant Article of the Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Articles 46 (2) 2 and 8 of the Guarantee of Compensation for Damages Caused by the Selection of Motor Vehicle;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the defendant has the same criminal records of six times or more for the reason of sentencing of the provisional payment order, and in the case of this case, the fact that the operation of the mandatory insurance not less than 16 times in total is discovered by using two vehicles, and the fact that it is not good that the operation of the non- mandatory insurance not less than 16 times in total, shall be determined as the same as the order.