Defendant

A Imprisonment for a year and six months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,00, and Defendant C by a fine of KRW 3,000,00.

Criminal facts

1. Defendant A

(a) No person who violates the Medical Service Act shall establish a medical institution, other than a doctor, dentist, midwifery, the State, a local government, a medical corporation, a non-profit corporation, a quasi-governmental institution under the Civil Act, or a quasi-governmental institution (hereinafter referred to as “doctor, etc.”);

Defendant

A established C with the principal office in Kim Jong-si (hereinafter referred to as the “Association”) in order to establish a medical institution even if no doctor, etc. was a around November 1, 2012, in order to establish a medical institution, and employed a doctor, nurse, physical clinic, etc. at the same place on January 14, 2013, and operated the medical institution in the name of the F Council member by October 2014.

Accordingly, the Defendant established a medical institution even though he is not a doctor, etc.

(b) Where a person who is not eligible to establish a medical institution in violation of the Medical Service Act has employed a medical doctor to perform medical practice, he/she shall not claim expenses for medical care benefits under the National Health Insurance Act;

Defendant

A, from January 14, 2013 to October 31, 2014, when operating the above member of the National Health Insurance Review and Evaluation Institute, had the patient provide medical treatment by employing the above member of the National Assembly from around October 14, 2014, and submitted a medical care benefits statement to the Health Insurance Review and Evaluation Institute for review. Upon receipt of notice of the results of the review, A received a total of KRW 376,03,441 on 19 occasions from the victim who believed it to be true and received the payment under the name of medical care benefits as shown in the attached list of crimes (1).

(c)

Defendant A, at the office of a union located in the above member of the Assembly on November 2012, 2012, without authority for the purpose of opening and operating the above member under the name of the union and exercising the authority to prepare for guidance inspections by the related agencies. Defendant A, without authority, was present at the meeting of the board of directors of the union while holding the meeting of G, H, and I, as if he were present at the meeting of the board of directors.