beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
In around 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 7 million due to the shortage of funds, etc., and was issued a summary order at around 2012-2013 to a violation of the Labor Standards Act, which provides for delayed payment of wages, on five occasions. While the financial situation at the time is not very good, the Defendant used a business entity that mainly borrowed money from others and operated the business entity with no special income, and the Defendant was subject to a complaint over several occasions due to a failure to repay borrowed money, and was in a very bad condition.
As such, in a situation where a personal financial situation is not good, the Defendant lent the name of F, 2.45 million won, which is located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, on May 13, 2013, and purchased the same amount in the amount of KRW 2.45 million, while performing remodeling work, and paying the purchase price and the remodeling cost, the Defendant’s payment of the purchase price and the remodeling cost is bound to cover only the amount of KRW 1.94 million borrowed from the Seogu Agricultural Cooperative as security without the Defendant’s capital. Therefore, even after remodeling work for the above her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her s
1. On July 2013, the Defendant made a false statement that “The Defendant would pay meal expenses to the victim’s I restaurant operated by the victim H in Daegu-gu, Seogu, 2013, when the victim, who was in the victim’s G, “The victim, who was in charge of the Mael Construction, and who was working at the construction site, would pay the victim’s meal expenses at the time.”
However, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay food expenses from time to time, even if he received meals from the victim at the construction site for large-scale repair work sites for the shortage of funds.
The defendant is proper for the victim.