beta
Text
1. The part concerning the claim for confirmation of the status as a person subject to relocation measures among the lawsuit in this case is dismissed.
2. The plaintiff's remaining claims.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On December 23, 2005, the Defendant publicly announced the residents’ public inspection of the planned housing site development area B housing site development project (hereinafter “instant project”).
B. On June 10, 2014, the Defendant sent a notice on the implementation of measures for migration and livelihood to a person subject to the relocation and livelihood measures of the instant business, and the main text thereof.
Details are as follows:
1) A person subject to supply of a housing site for migrants (a) shall be the date of public inspection by the residents of B (hereinafter referred to as “date of public inspection”; hereinafter referred to as “date of public inspection”); A person who has continuously resided in a house and has continued to reside in the house before the date of concluding a compensation contract or the date of adjudication on expropriation before the date of public inspection by the residents of B (hereinafter referred to as “date of public inspection”); A person who has acquired compensation for the house from the project operator and emigrates to the implementation of the project after receiving compensation therefor; b) a lot of housing for one household (one lot of housing if the same household with a house living together owns two or more houses), and a person subject to special supply of housing: A person who has waived the right to the housing site among those subject to supply of the migrants and requested special supply of housing and requested special supply of housing for five percent or less of the appraised amount of the housing site to be supplied by the project operator; and a person who has received compensation for five percent or less of the appraised amount of the housing site subject to relocation by the project operator;
C. The Plaintiff’s mother C is the instant business area.