logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2013.06.13 2013고정230
의료법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a medical person licensed as a herb doctor.

No medical person who has a license for herb doctor shall perform any medical practice other than those licensed.

Nevertheless, the defendant

1. Between August 13, 2012 and November 30, 2012, the Defendant performed medical acts outside of the license by inserting 2,000 ml, ampl, ampl, ampl, ampl, ampl, ampl, ampl, ampl, ampl, ampl, ampl, ampl, ampl, ampl, ampl, ampl, ampl, ampl, ampl, ampl, ampl, ampl, ampl

2. From February 5, 2010 to December 31, 2012, 2012, while administering a dynasium medication with nine patients, such as F, etc., within the said place, the dynasium was designated as prescription drugs, and only a person holding a medical license, was able to use dcc of dcc of synasium drugs by mixing them with 4cc of synasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dy

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A written accusation;

1. Mebama (mix method), details of Taebabide vaccination patients, detailed statement of transactions, list of detection site photographs, and copies of diagnosis and treatment set;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (Attachment to the details of use of Libya);

1. Article 87 (1) 2 of the Medical Service Act and Article 27 (1) of the same Act concerning facts constituting a crime and the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion on the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act refers to the case where a law site is simply a site, because the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the use of a Korean medicine doctor was not known to the fact that it was illegal, as a profin component of the same flusium as the "flusium" stated in paragraph (1) of the same Article.

arrow