A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 31, 2018, at around 02:32, the Defendant was urged to stop assaulting by the chief of the police box belonging to the Seoul Gangnam-gu Seoul Southern Police Station C, which was called out after receiving a report from a female-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-

Defendant’s “Isle women????”

D. Whether D. B. L. L. L. L. L.

“In doing so, he led the bridge of the above D, as seen above, the police officer assaulted the police officer and arrested him as a flagrant offender who interfered with the performance of official duties, when he sawd the above D as a drinking blue, and blue blue blue blue blue flue blue flue flue flue flue flue flue flue D with the left hand.

As a result, the Defendant assaulted D, obstructed the legitimate execution of duties by police officers related to the dispatch of 112 declaration and arrest of flagrant offenders, and, at the same time, placed the victim D (32 tax) on the 8 left-hand side of the 8th left-hand side requiring treatment of about 4 weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. E written statements;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 40 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is that the Defendant’s assault on the ground of protection observation and community service order, and the degree of injury to the police officer is not somewhat weak.

In order to protect women's friendship between the defendant and the defendant, violence was inflicted on the police officer dispatched to protect them.

Although the defendant was punished for a fine for the same kind of crime, he again committed this crime.

However, the defendant is opposed to the crime of this case.

No punishment exceeding a fine shall be imposed.

In this case by chance.