1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the amount ordered to be paid below is revoked, and above.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing this case is that the court of first instance citing this case is citing the part of the 14th to 5th to 10th (g) of the judgment of the court of first instance (g) as follows, and thus, citing this case as it is based on Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

"Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 19,334,910 won [= property damage 9,334,910 won + [(5,00,00 won 10,356,420 won] x limitation of liability 1,322,290 won x limitation of liability - 70% - 6,216,759 won]] as damages for violation of the defendant's duty of care due to the defendant's violation of the defendant's medical practice] and damages for delay from April 30, 2014, which is deemed reasonable to dispute about the existence and scope of the defendant's duty of care from April 24, 2018 to October 24, 2018."

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims shall be dismissed as they are without merit.

The judgment of the court of first instance is unfair with a different conclusion. As such, the part against the defendant in excess of the above-mentioned part of the appeal shall be revoked, and the plaintiff's claim corresponding to the above-mentioned part shall be dismissed, and the remaining appeal by the defendant