logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.04.23 2019고단4451
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 29, 2019, at around 02:28, the Defendant interfered with the business of the Defendant boarding a victim B (69 years of age) taxi in the vicinity of the Northwest-dong film-dong, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and let the victim operate a taxi to the front of the territory of the territory of the Republic of Korea. On the same day, around 02:32 of the same day, the Defendant stopped a taxi before the territory of the territory of the Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-dong, and displayed a business registration certificate for about five minutes, without paying the price to the victim. “On two occasions, the Defendant took care of the victim’s head behind the e zone located in the same Gu-dong, Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, and at around 03:20 of the same day, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s business by continuously taking advantage of the victim.

2. Although the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, as stated in paragraph (1) of June 29, 2019, demanded the payment of KRW 5,000 of the taxi fare to the territory of the territory of the territory of the territory of the Republic of Korea, the Defendant did not impose a value on his/her business without good cause even on the part of the Defendant, by taking on the part of the victim’s desire to pay the taxi fee,

3. At around 03:20 on June 29, 2019, the Defendant: (a) committed assault, such as assaulting a police officer, on one occasion, to have a part of the above F’s left side, such as the front side, the part of the said F, and the part of the said F, in order to have the Defendant embark on the patrol vehicle in order to move the Defendant to a criminal case of the Suwon Heavy Police Station at around 04:48 on the same day, the Defendant obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression, and investigation of the crime, by obstructing the police officer’s performance of duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to F and B;

1. B written statements;

1. A criminal investigation report (case concerning documentary evidence image), investigation report (including a copy of the analysis of records of operation of a taxi attached to the victim's taxi - a copy of the attached taxi (C);

1. On-site photographs, taxi drivers' certificates, and victims;

arrow