logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.11.10 2016고정1150
자동차관리법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a business employee.

Automobiles shall be operated by the owner or a person entrusted with matters concerning the operation, etc. of automobiles by the owner of such automobiles, and no motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance shall be operated on the road.

On April 21, 2016, at around 13:10, the Defendant purchased the E-G car to 5.3 million won, which is owned by the Silsan Development Co., Ltd., a “Malsan Development Co., Ltd.,” which was known through the Internet website from the name in front of Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, without being entrusted with matters concerning the operation of the said vehicle by the said company as the owner of the said vehicle, operated the said vehicle from the above temporary border and the above location to the Daejeon F, 414 Dong 1104, which is the Defendant’s domicile, and operated the said vehicle from the above location to the Daejeon High School located in Daejeon Middle-gu, Daejeon, 110, which is the Defendant’s domicile, around 10:30 on April 26, 2016.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Seizure records, investigation reports (with regard to confirmation, etc. as to whether to purchase mandatory insurance), and application of Acts and subordinate statutes reporting the results of investigation;

1. Article 81 subparagraph 7-2 of the Motor Vehicle Management Act and Articles 24-2 (1) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Articles 46 (2) 2 and 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (limited to concurrent crimes prescribed for the violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act as of April 26, 2016, with the largest penalty) among concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow