Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

At around 15:00 on May 24, 2013, the Defendant: (a) had no fact that the Victim G was entering another male and introduced the Victim G as her husband; (b) had damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts by publicly pointing out the following: (c) having no fact that the Victim G was her husband; (d) having 6 and 7 people, such as the F president and the customer, and H at the place where the volume of 6 and 7 people are heard.

Summary of Evidence

1. Some statements concerning the suspect examination protocol of the defendant;

1. Application of the respective legal statements of witnesses I, G and H to the law applicable;

1. Relevant Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the assertion did not perform any act identical to the facts constituting the crime in the judgment, and rather was somewhat excessive speech and behaviored.

Even if the defendant borrowed money from his family, etc. and borrowed it to G, the defendant's act is not considered to be beyond the validity of social norms.

2. According to the reasoning of the judgment, the facts constituting a crime are sufficiently recognized, and other arguments are asserted as legitimate acts.

Even if the defendant's act does not violate the social rules, the above argument is rejected.