Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, who suffered property damage, was on board a taxi operated by the victim C with alcohol, as a guest.

On May 24, 2014, around 15:55, the Defendant: (a) removed the empty light, which is equivalent to KRW 30,00,00,00 from the market price in the taxi, as his hand, on the ground that the Defendant did not get off the victim’s “E Hospital” in front of the emergency room located in the Southern-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City on the ground that the charge is unfair.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the property owned by the victim.

2. The Defendant damaged public goods at the above time and place, on the ground that he was arrested as a flagrant offender on the ground that he was arrested as a flagrant offender at H in the position of the G District in the Ponam Police Station G District of the Posi Police Station G District, which was called the above taxi engineer C, at the above time and place.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged public goods.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness C and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to one copy of a receipt for repairing expenses submitted by C to the victim of damage to property, such as photographing an empty light sign, photographing a picture of a patrol car, photographing a picture of a

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act, and selection of fines for each crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that there was no fact that the defendant damaged the pentular part of the patrol car due to the patrol.

However, according to the evidence duly admitted, H state the following circumstances, i.e., the circumstance during which the present site was dispatched from the investigative agency to the present court, consistently stated that the Defendant had the patrol pentle part of the right pentle to this Court.