logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2018.05.31 2017고단1165
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 4, 2016, the Defendant, “2017 Highest 1165, the Defendant,” in the mutual inficial coffee shop located in Daegu Si-si, would promote a joint project for PM of the D Regional Housing Association in Daegu-si, and if the Defendant borrowed KRW 100 million, he would proceed with the above project and add dividends of KRW 200 million to the principal and pay at least 20% annual interest until June 30, 2016, even if the project is not properly carried out.

“A false representation was made.”

However, the Defendant did not have any particular occupation at that time and did not have any economic income, and even if he received money from the injured party, he did not intend to use it for his living expenses or debt repayment, etc., and did not have any intent or ability to pay the said principal, interest, etc. to the injured party within the time limit that the said money would normally proceed with or promised to do so.

Around February 4, 2016, the Defendant deceptioned the victim as above and acquired KRW 100 million from the victim to the E F account (G) designated by the Defendant.

On April 21, 2011, the Defendant shows the agreement to sell the land to the victim J at the I cafeteria located in Geum-gu, Busan around April 21, 201, and “A comprehensive construction company operates a general construction company, Kim Jong-si, which is developing a general industrial complex at the K K Institute at the Kimhae-si, and if the land for industrial use is developed, it will give priority to sale to the public.

It is necessary to lend 30,000,000 won as the capital of the emergency project is required, plus 30,000,000 won after one year after the loan.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the Defendant did not have any particular income at that time and did not have any intention or ability to pay the principal and interest within the time period during which the said money was normally carried out or promised to carry out the sale project.

On April 21, 201, the defendant deceivings the victim as above, and is against the victim.

arrow