1. Of the judgment subject to a retrial, the part against the Plaintiff (Plaintiffs) among the judgment subject to a retrial is revoked and thus revoked.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Farmland distribution, etc. 1) The land of approximately 3,00,000 square meters for the land of this case (hereinafter “the land of this case”) including the land of about 4,16 square meters, Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government L. 4.16

The answer was the first answer, which was enforced by Japan during the Japanese occupation period from 1942 to 1943, and the registration was completed in the name of the State (U.S.). Nevertheless, the land category on the register was still remaining as it was not used as a military facility or military land, and the original farmer was cultivated as farmland by the original farmer. On March 10, 1950, the Farmland Reform Act was amended and promulgated, and the farmland distribution procedure was conducted for the land of this case, and the farmland distribution procedure was conducted for the farmland distribution from 1950 to 1952. However, around May 1953, the Ministry of National Defense had the Defendant claim that the land of this case was managed by the Army, and the Defendant did not receive more repayment of the ownership, and the Defendant did not receive repayment from the Ministry of National Defense as part of the land of this case from the Ministry of National Defense to the Industrial Complex Development on September 1, 1961.

The Seoul Special Metropolitan City started the new construction of 1,200 units of public housing to remove the standard house, 1,100 units of simple housing, and completed the construction completion occupancy on August 8, 1962 to 9, and created N, O, P, and private housing sites in the above K zone.

B. 85 persons, including A, including 85 persons (hereinafter “64A5133 Plaintiffs”), are the filing of a civil suit and winning in a lawsuit by farmers.

On June 19, 1964, the Seoul Civil District Court filed a lawsuit against the Defendant for the implementation of the procedure for the registration of transfer of ownership (the above court 64Do5133) on the ground that “78,422 of the land of the instant K was distributed among the land of the instant K,” and sought reimbursement (the above court 64Do5133).

The Seoul Central District Court won the above plaintiffs on March 9, 1967.