logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.10.13 2017고단1942
도로교통법위반(무면허운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 18, 2017, around 11:10, the Defendant driven a Clearning car without obtaining a driver’s license from a section of about 2 km away from the 2km to the front road of the ridge apartment at the same time, which is located in the middle of the Jeju-si, 2017.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Report on the circumstances of driving without a license;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the ledger of driver's licenses;

1. Article 152 of the relevant Act and Articles 152 subparagraph 1 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act, and the selection of fines concerning the crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was already sentenced to two times due to drinking driving in 2014. However, on July 26, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months, and a community service order was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months, and even though the driver’s license was revoked due to the said drinking driving, the Defendant committed the instant non-licensed driving without a license. Therefore, the nature of the crime is very poor.

However, the defendant appears to be in the position of being against the defendant, and the vehicle is sold in the absence of driving again, and the mental department seems to have been making efforts to a certain extent, such as receiving psychological counseling, and there is no record of being punished for driving without a license, and the defendant's age, sex, environment, circumstances of crime, circumstances after crime, etc. shall be determined as ordered only once by taking into account the various sentencing conditions specified in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex

arrow