1. The Defendant shall pay to each of the Plaintiffs the amount of KRW 13,33,30 and each of the said amounts to the day of full payment from September 2, 2017.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On April 22, 2014, I leased J Apartment K from the Defendant as security deposit of 120,000,000, monthly rent of 1,000,000, and the lease term of 24 months from June 20, 2014, and paid 12,00,000,000 out of the lease deposit on the day to the Defendant, respectively, on June 20, 2014.

B. I and the Defendant agreed that the lease deposit shall be paid to the Defendant Intervenor H upon the termination of the above lease agreement.

C. On the other hand, as a result of the inspection conducted by a L Hospital on May 15, 2012, I conducted an inspection at the L Hospital, the results of the inspection were 9 points for MP MM Mini National Exc - KC (Korean simple mental condition inspection). The results of the inspection of GDS showed that the overall seriousness is divided into 7 clinical steps of GDS 7 (Recognition disorder of terminal dementia) by taking into account the following factors: (a) liobal deteral deteral’s personality and mental condition inspection results in recognition function, walking, daily activities, etc.; and (b) the results of the inspection of GDS’s personality and mental condition inspection.

It was judged that the recognition disorder of the 6th stage was a serious disability.

I, as a result of the examination conducted by the Social Department of M Hospital on May 26, 2012, MPE-KC scores were seven points in terms of the fall of the middle light, and was determined by dementia on the same day.

I was inspected by N Hospital on April 2, 2014, and scores were three points.

I died on March 30, 2016, and under the chain, nine children, such as the plaintiffs, the supplementary intervenor H, non-party O, and P, are 1/9 each share of inheritance.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 through 11, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of recognition, requiring the Defendant’s Intervenor to deposit money at the time of the above lease agreement constitutes an act of disposal that transfers the returned claim to the Defendant’s Intervenor, and as seen earlier, in light of the fact that I was judged as a middle witness disability and dementia at the time, and that the state has deteriorated continuously after having been determined as such, I did not have the capacity to do so, and thus, the act of disposal is null and void.