logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2021.02.25 2020고단8718
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant conspiredd to commit the crime of telephone finance fraud with the non-faced financial fraud assistance staff by misrepresenting the employees of financial institutions to take charge of collecting cash when receiving a proposal from the non-named telephone finance fraud (one-name phishing) staff and falsely collecting the victims.

On April 10, 2020, 11:00 p.m. AC staff member misrepresented the victim AC staff at a place with a low interest rate and sent a copy of his identification card to AC bank to the victim, and the victim consented to the loan, thereby making the loan defective, and the other nameless Boscing staff member misrepresented the victim at around 10:0 on April 13, 2020, thereby violating the contract for the loan for the purpose of exchange.

If a loan is not repaid immediately, it will be an bad credit holder.

The purpose of this paper was to say that, if you send the table deposit to be sent by the staff of the Financial Supervisory Service, they would unfasten the contractual breach case.

However, the above name in fact was not an employee of the financial institution.

The above names and influences deceiving the victim as above, and the defendant was sent the victim's address and appearance from the above name in that time, and around April 13, 2020, around 14:20, the defendant was delivered with the victim's address and appearance, etc., and even if he was not an employee belonging to the Financial Supervisory Service, the victim was sent to the victim a "payment certificate" in the name of AF bank by delivering the victim's "payment certificate" in the name of AF bank to the victim and then was delivered to the victim in cash from the victim's place of action, such as an employee belonging to the Financial Supervisory Service.

At around 13:30 on April 14, 2020, the following day, the Defendant continued to engage in driving, such as an employee belonging to the Financial Supervisory Service, even if he/she re-satisfyed the victim in front of the exit of the same 1st century, and was not an employee belonging to the Financial Supervisory Service.

arrow